Search for: "U-Haul Co. of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, denying the defendant company’s move to compel its workers to arbitrate their representative Private Attorney General Act claims for wage-and-hour violations. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:00 pm
U-Haul Co. of California. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co., 145 Cal.App.4th 1243 (2006). [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Dec. 19, 2006), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five), held 2-1 that a "no class action" abitration provision in an employment contract was enforceable under Discover Bank v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:48 am
U-Haul Co. of Cal., the plaintiffs brought individual retaliation claims against their former employer under Labor Code § 1102.5. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,481.Franchisor’s “Physical Presence” Not Needed for Income Taxation in IowaThe essence of the much-discussed recent decision in KFC Corporation v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Co. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:21 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, — Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
U-Haul Co. of California (2023) 88Cal.App.5th 65, 77(Rocha). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:01 am
U-Haul Co. of California: unpublished California decision once again trying to apply SLAPP to lawyer (i.e., a malicious prosecution claim). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:22 pm
U-Haul Co. of Cal. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
” Unbelievable… you mean the people who haven’t made a mortgage payment in well over a year need the state’s help to come up with the dough to hire a U-Haul? [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:47 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, the court denied plaintiff’s request to amend their Labor Code § 1102.5 [retaliation] complaint to add a PAGA claim and, instead, compelled the matter to arbitration. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802 803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, supra, 143 Cal.App.4th at p. 807.) [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802-803.) [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796, 802-803 [plaintiff alleged he was required to purchase excess fuel when returning rental truck]; Monarch Plumbing Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
U-Haul Co. of California, Dec. 11, 2017, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two More Blog Entries: Study: 4 in 10 Drivers Admit to Phone Distractions Due to Their Job, Dec. 19, 2017, Orlando Car Accident Lawyer Blog [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796; Aguiar v. [read post]
